|
 |
WILL BERNARD HOPKINS BEAT HIS OWN DEMONS TONIGHT?
By
Elisa Harrison
Posted: Sunday, June 06, 2004
|
 |
"Is
it a human possibility there is a vendetta there? Maybe he's
not thinking it, but why risk it?" Bernard Hopkins on
referee Joe Cortez
|
|
MIAMI, FLA.---Veteran
referee Joe Cortez said he wouldn't step down. The Nevada State
Athletic Commission stood its grounds refusing to substitute Cortez;
so I suppose it's fair to say that Bernard "The Executioner"
Hopkins gave up on his latest cry for attention, finally agreeing
to fight under the fair but firm Joe Cortez.
What was the compromise, you ask? Would
you believe additional cameras focusing on the referee only throughout
the bout? Perhaps a more real concern should be how many fans
are going to be interested enough in this farce of a card to pay
to see it...
Just when I thought we had a new and
improved version of Bernard Hopkins, the old demons re-surface,
with Hopkins making a mad dash for the airport Friday afternoon,
close to twenty-four hours before fight time, threatening to sabotage
not just this promotion, (and a reportedly two million dollar
paycheck), but the ultimate ten million dollar showdown with Oscar
de la Hoya (assuming Hopkins beats Allen and Oscar takes care
of Sturm) already penciled in for the fall.
What is Bernard Hopkins dealing with?
What is he thinking? Why does he insist on making such an ass
out of himself?
We won't re-hash Hopkins' disrespect
of Puerto Rico, Puerto Ricans and Latinos world over but it just
seems as though Bernard's paranoia keeps getting the best of him.
Having protested Cortez twice before, (in Hopkins vs Trinidad
and in Hopkins vs Joppy), Bernard now decides that Cortez could
be harboring some sort of animosity against him and therefore,
he attempts to strong-arm the Commission and the promotion, (strong-arming
got him a hefty jail sentence years ago), into eliminating Cortez
from this fight.
Let me see if I'm following the plot
correctly... Bernard Hopkins protested against Joe Cortez when
he fought Trinidad because of the referee's Puerto Rican ancestry.
He then protested against Cortez in the Joppy mismatch because
since Cortez is of Puerto Rican descent he may have been offended
by Hopkins' disgraceful antics against Puerto Ricans, and, Hopkins
now protests against Cortez because Cortez may hold a grudge against
him for the two prior protests.
I've said this before and I'll say it
again... Bernard Hopkins is not now, nor has he ever been the
draw. He was thrust to the limelight in 2001 by Felix 'Tito' Trinidad
and he now stands a chance to make a stab at a huge payday because
Oscar de la Hoya has granted him sidekick status.
Hopkins' insatiable thirst for attention
during the Trinidad promotion prompted him to disrespect the Latino
fans who -by all accounts- are the lifeline of the sport; the
same need for recognition now puts him in what many consider a
no win situation.
If we are to buy into Bernard's theory,
it would then be a foregone conclusion that Joe Cortez should
really be hating Hopkins now, along with the Nevada State Athletic
Boxing Commission; the HBO and MGM Hotel suits too, since
he has now ticked all of them off, right? Should Hopkins be requesting
a change of venue? A change of city and state as well, since perhaps
the officials will remember this latest faux pas and score his
fight accordingly? I mean, how do you allay all the possible negatives
now?
To go a step further, what are the implications
of Hopkins' outrageous behavior? Are we saying that fighters won't
get a fair shake unless the person who referees their bouts is
of the same ethnic background? This is as ridiculous as it is
offensive, and if I had been inclined to pay to watch this show
-which I never was- I certainly would have canceled my order by
now.
I thought it was bad enough that Oscar
de la Hoya is fighting for a title in a new weight division, while
coming off a loss and with no hardware of his own. (Tito did it,
yes, undefeated and a champion in the lower weight class, just
in case you are wondering). In the words of Winky Wright"
leave it to Oscar to fight the only middleweight champion with
only nine KOs to his name." Tonight's main and co-main events
seem like a perfectly choreographed WWF show, with a forced Hoya-Hopkins
match as the top prize down the road, and I am simply not feeling
it, let alone buying it.
Bernard Hopkins' behavior has done nothing
to enhance the overall picture, quite the opposite. I can't help
but wonder how Hopkins antics will go over should he and Oscar
de la Hoya meet as seems to be already decided? Could Hopkins
be concerned about having Joe Cortez in the ring because he knows
Cortez won't tolerate his dirty antics? If anything goes wrong
tonight in the Hopkins-Allen bout, Cortez will probably come under
fire, not to mention the officials and who knows, even the commission
may face Hopkins' wrath. Too much drama...
Boxing fans, don't be fooled for a minute,
the truth of the matter is that had Hopkins' refusal to face Robert
Allen forced the cancellation of tonight's show, Hopkins would
have faced huge law suits and a possible long-term suspension
from the NSAC for refusal to fight, which in effect, would have
executed Bernard Hopkins' career.
I commend Joe Cortez and the Nevada State
Athletic Commission for doing the right thing and not yielding
to Hopkins' demands. I can only hope against hope that the sport
of boxing deals Bernard Hopkins a dose of humility tonight. I
venture to say that a Robert Allen victory would certainly give
Mr. Hopkins a new perspective on things...
6-5-2004
Copyright 2006 by BlackAthlete.net, Inc. All Rights Reserved.