|
|
 |
Are We Really Shocked
by Drugs in Sports? By Charles L. Williams Posted: Wednesday,
May 19, 2004 |
LINDEN, NJ.---The New
York Times recently ran a story stating the International Olympic
Committee said drug testing in many sports has been very lax and
the same appears to be true for the upcoming Olympic Games. The
article also stated that record breaking performances in any sport
involving strength and speed would be suspect. Steve Holman, one
of the United States' premier milers, was quoted as saying that
the report's conclusions on the efficiency of drug testing reiterated
what he and others had been saying for years.
Before the 1980s drugs were associated only with strength and
gaining weight and were not believed to offer any benefit to runners.
Thus shot putters, hammer throwers, discus, and javelin throwers
were the ones who were observed with an occasional raised eyebrow
and skeptical eye. Now, especially since the Ben Johnson debacle
in 1988 and the years later suspension and reinstatement of 400
meter runner Butch Reynolds, sprinter Merlene Ottey's suspension
last year and the similar plight of other athletes, track and
field has become a sport where mental asterisks accompany many
performances. How did all this start?
Drugs were first used in the 1950s among Soviet Union weightlifters.
Dianabol was the name of the principal (and perhaps only) drug
then and it quickly became popular among strength athletes. There
were also (as today) numerous, often unpredictable side effects:
A basketball player at the college I attended used Dianabol to
gain strength and weight but promptly stopped when he began to
urinate blood. Soon, other drugs were developed and they were
found to be effective in aiding runners as well.
About the same time food supplements were becoming popular among
athletes and some people put them in the same category as drugs.
But that is incorrect. A drug changes the way the body functions,
period. It offers no nourishment. It does not replace something
the body has used in the performance of exercise or other stress.
Ironically, it may be possible that some over the counter food
supplements, unknown to the buyer, contain ingredients that are
not only natural but are also "laced" with muscle building
and performance enhancing drugs.
Ottey and others have claimed this is what happened to them and
Craig Masback, the director of US Track and Field noted that such
a thing is possible.
Yet, as society cringes about the proliferation of drugs in neighborhoods
and on the playing fields, society has also failed to honestly
look itself in the mirror. There have been numerous debates and
discussions about athletes damaging their body with drugs for
fame, glory, and monetary gain. The irony is that most of the
people who criticize athletes and others who take drugs are addicts
themselves.
Most people in the United States are addicts, but they are unaware
of it or in a state of denial. Many of those who are not in a
state of denial believe that caffeine and nicotine are the most
common drugs to which people are addicted. Not true. It is white
sugar. White sugar is a drug because it offers no nourishment
to the body, only carbohydrates, which are used as fuel. And for
the body to metabolize any sugar it requires nutrients that are
with most sugars in their natural state. All fruits contain sugars
and they bring with them an assortment of vitamins and minerals.
White sugar has been stripped of these things, so in order for
it to be metabolized the body has to "steal" from whatever
vitamins and minerals it has within it. That is why there is often
a decrease in energy after the initial upsurge in energy after
eating candy or other sweets.
If you think that white sugar is not addictive or that you not
addicted to white sugar or caffeine, try a simple test: for one
week drink nothing but water to quench your thirst. No fruit drinks,
fruit juices, soda, coffee, or tea. Most people cannot go beyond
a couple of days drinking water as their only liquid, and they
then run for the nearest sweetened or caffeinated drink. Then
they (you?) sit and are shocked by drugs in sports. They (you?)
are initially addicted to sugar because of the taste, caffeine
because it "picks you up," nicotine usually because
of foolish attempts to be "hip' or "cool."
If drug use in sports is to be eliminated the motivation(s) for
taking them will have to be addressed. This means the contemporary
values placed upon fame, glory, and money need to be examined
and altered. Drug usage in society will have to be eliminated
as well. This means an honest assessment of what in today's world
drives people of all races, ethnicities, and income levels to
(hard) drug usage. Also, what of the nicotine, caffeine, and sugar
addicts? Why are these things so readily available if they make
people addicts?
Honestly addressing and implementing steps to eliminate the causes
and use of all addictive substances will bring about a world that
has never existed. So when we look at this year's Olympic track
and field competitions the whispers will certainly be there. There
are efforts underway, albeit losing so far, to make the whispers
obsolete. The larger world in which most of us live, unfortunately,
has no such whispers. Yet, given the often confused, conflicting,
and illogical realities in which we are submerged, we should be
shouting.
Ready!… Take your Marks!… Set!… Run to where?