| Innocent or Not, Damage is Done
By Stephen A. Smith
Off the BlackAthlete Sports Wire
Posted: Saturday, March 29, 2004
|
 |
| Marion Jones |
PHILADELPHIA, PA.---Supposedly,
the evidence is explosive. Enough to make Marion Jones sweat,
cry - and if the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency had its druthers - confess.
To a violation they believe she's committed, but one they can't
prove. At least not yet.
The question is: Does it even matter
anymore?
What if the world's greatest female sprinter
isn't a cheat? What if she isn't the second coming of Ben Johnson,
Kelli White or even her ex-husband, C.J. Hunter?
What if Marion Jones is innocent? Where
does she go from here?
The insidious part of this whole Balco steroid scandal is that
of all the questions being asked, that has not been primary among
them.
In America.
Where there is supposed to be a presumption
of innocence.
There was a time we all cared about such
things.
Evidently, not anymore.
We've all heard the latest murmurs emanating
from this Balco investigation: Some training calendar, used by
those involved in this already devastating scandal, contains possible
codes for drug use. There is one with the initials "MJ"
on it.
As far as the USADA knows, it doesn't
stand for Michael Jordan. Certainly not Michael Jackson, Michael
Johnson or Magic Johnson. So in all probability, it stands for
Marion Jones.
No charges have been filed, although
the five-time Olympic medalist was among a handful of athletes
to testify before a grand jury. No indictment has been handed
down against Jones, either.
Jones has never tested positive for drug
use and she hasn't been banned from participating in this summer's
Olympics. In fact, Jones is scheduled to compete in the Olympic
track and field trials (July 9-18) in Sacramento, Calif., which
makes it even more egregious.
No wonder Jones' own lawyers have resorted
to the court of public opinion to plead their case.
"I don't think the documents come
anywhere close to constituting sufficient evidence that she committed
a doping violation," attorney Jim Coleman, who has prosecuted
and defended high-profile drug cases, told USA Today. "But
I think her reputation has probably been destroyed.
"She doesn't have to be banned from
track and field to be damaged. If Nike or some other company decides
these documents suggest she may be dirty, they can sever their
relationship with her. They don't need proof she did anything
wrong."
Let's not be stupid here: Hunter, Jones'
ex-husband, tested positive for the steroid nandrolone months
before the Sydney Games in 2000. Her boyfriend, Tim Montgomery,
the father of her child, is currently being investigated as well.
Jones was once coached by Trevor Graham
and had a short affiliation with disgraced coach Charlie Francis,
who was connected to steroid use by Canadian sprinter Ben Johnson,
who was stripped of a gold medal in the 100 meters in 1988. Both
Graham and Francis are intimately connected with Balco.
We get the picture.
But mistakes happen all the time.
In corporate America. In our criminal
justice system. And certainly, in sports, the land of jealousy
and envy. While surmising that Jones is guilty of drug use is
plausible, we have not seen any concrete evidence.
Otherwise, she would not be competing
right now.
So why were the names of Jones, Barry
Bonds, Jason Giambi or anyone else released in the first place?
Is someone going to tell me the federal government could not have
elected to handle all this under the radar?
Please!
I'll say it before and I'll say it again:
Where was all this talk when Mark McGwire was chasing Roger Maris'
home-run record?
If having the steroid androstenedione
sitting in your locker doesn't qualify as probable cause to dig
deeper, why has one athlete after another been placed at the public
guillotine - with little more than initials, innuendo and a State
of the Union address to go on?
Jones may be guilty of all these accusations
in the end. So may Bonds, Giambi, Gary Sheffield or a host of
other athletes.
If they are, they'll have to pay the
price. And they won't receive any sympathy this way.
But until then, I prefer to look at the
process. This presumption of guilt that precedes all else.
It stinks. But only after Maris' record
was captured, not before.
Quite frankly, that should bother all of us.